Local governments move to end Flock surveillance contracts

At least 10 local governments have moved to terminate, deactivate, or decline to renew contracts for Flock Safety’s automated license plate reader surveillance cameras since the summer. While recent reports highlight this figure, advocacy groups tracking the technology report that hundreds of communities have taken similar actions since 2021, with dozens of municipalities acting throughout 2026.

The decisions to move away from the surveillance systems are driven by concerns regarding privacy, data storage, and the sharing of information with third parties, including federal immigration and law enforcement agencies. Some local officials have also cited issues with the procurement process and a lack of transparency in how the technology is deployed.

Public pressure has frequently preceded these administrative decisions or council votes. In Longmont, Colorado, resident Andrew Palmer noted that community groups remain focused on the removal of the cameras, stating that many residents would like to see them go away for good.

During a debate over the potential termination of contracts in Toledo, Ohio, City Councilman Sam Melden remarked on the internal discussions among his colleagues regarding the future of the surveillance program. Meanwhile, Flock Safety maintains that its new city partnerships continue to outpace non-renewals, asserting that the technology remains a vital tool for law enforcement to assist in solving crimes.